|
GOLSCO Books Online Store | UK | Germany |
| books | baby | camera | computers | dvd | games | electronics | garden | kitchen | magazines | music | phones | software | tools | toys | video |
| Help |
| Books - Law - Perspectives on Law - Gender & the Law - People of Color in Law Schools |
| 1-18 of 18 1 |
| Featured List | Simple List |
Go to bottom to see all images
Click image to enlarge
|
The Alchemy of Race and Rights by Patricia J. Williams Average Customer Review: Hardcover (01 April, 1991) list price: $29.95 US | Canada | United Kingdom | Germany | France Editorial Review In a personal and profound examination of the United States legal system and its effect on African Americans, Patricia J. Williams uses the term alchemy--the medieval, mysterious practice of turning base metal into gold--as a haunting metaphor for the nearly mystical process by which United States law emboldens and endangers blacks through arcane interpretation, as well as the heroic will of a people to make those laws manifest. "I'm interested in the way in which the legal language flattens and confines in absolutes the complexity of meaning inherent in any given problem," she writes. "I am trying to challenge the usual limits of commercial discourse by using an intentionally double-voiced and relational, rather than a traditionally legal black letter, vocabulary." With an authorial voice that draws upon Williams's perspective as teacher, lawyer, black American, and woman, The Alchemy of Race and Rights uses a palette of court cases, educational encounters, and personal experiences--including her discovery of her slave ancestor and her interactions with school deans over how to teach law--to create a literary cubist portrait detailing the rhetoric and reality that color the complexion of American justice. --Eugene Holley Jr. ... Read more Reviews (11)
Isbn: 0674014707 |
|
|
How Did You Get to Be Mexican?: A White/Brown Man's Search for Identity by Kevin R. Johnson Average Customer Review: Paperback (01 June, 1999) list price: $25.95 -- our price: $25.95 (price subject to change: see help) US | Canada | United Kingdom | Germany | France Reviews (11)
Contradictions run wild in Kevin Johnson's autobiographical account of growing up racially mixed and emotionally mixed up. On one page, he rightly laments racial pigeonholing. On the next, he paints a painfully detailed picture of someone's racial history and physical features. The book is replete with mixed heritage characters who "identify" publicly with the racial tradition of one parent over that of another. At first this approach left me frustrated (maybe I yearned for transcendence). But soon I realized that Johnson could hardly tell his story otherwise: the contradictions are not his but society's. Such is the sad - indeed the surreal - state of America's racial politics. However sad and surreal race relations indeed may be, books like Johnson's represent a breakthrough of sorts for diversity and understanding. For most of our nation's history, dispossessed individuals were truly silenced - either by poverty or outright discrimination. As society began to allow different voices to emerge, pure outsiders got most of the attention. Now people like Johnson, who inhabits what the book jacket calls "the borderlands between racial identities," are receiving the call to tell their stories. Before I run on any longer, I should reveal some modest secrets of my own. Johnson and I attended the same high school in Southern California. In college, in the late 1970s, we shared two different apartments on Berkeley's Haste Street, a student ghetto just south of the University of California campus. We remained friends as he progressed through the legal profession to his current position as associate dean for academic affairs and professor of law at the University of California, Davis. Johnson was born in 1958, the first child of a White father and a Mexican American mother. His parents divorced when he was young, and he grew up hopscotching from the barrio's poverty to the relative affluence of the beach cities near Los Angeles. Johnson's mother, a staunch assimilationist, neither taught him Spanish nor encouraged pride in his Latin roots. When she remarried, she attached herself yet another Anglo. Following the advice of his politically savvy father, the adolescent Johnson began to ponder his Mexican American background. He began taking Spanish in high school. He continued in college. Meanwhile Berkeley introduced him - as it did us all - to heretofore unimagined diversity. Yet, to me, my roommate seemed most comfortable while slam dancing to the Dead Kennedys at the San Francisco punk club Mabuhay Gardens. White like me, I would have told anyone who bothered to ask about his racial identity (though I knew, of course, about his mother's background). Tellingly, no one raised the question. My analysis at the time partly reflected my own lack of maturity and perception, but there's little doubt that Harvard Law School forced my friend unequivocally out of his Latino closet. Like other Harvard law students from modest economic and social backgrounds, he wondered whether he really deserved his place in the elite institution. Had the admissions committee let him in just because he'd checked the Latino box on the application? Even after he made law review, he could never convince himself. His chapter about Harvard, which opens the book, should be required reading for any undergraduate contemplating the LSAT. This isn't the first time someone has slammed Harvard Law, and it won't be the last, but Johnson's account makes the experience seem outright hellish for anyone with the slightest non-conformist streak. Pranks (probably innocuous to your average Yale man) resound with new meaning when aimed at a sensitive outsider. For his defense of affirmative action, Johnson earned a citation in a spoof yearbook as author of a volume entitled, "I Hate Whites." Nearly two decades later, the barb still stings. After law school, Johnson plunged into pro bono work on behalf of Latin American immigrants and married a woman of Mexican American descent. Virginia helped him grow more comfortable with his identity, and together they try to provide a foundation of Mexican culture for their three children. Policy discussions generally take a backseat in Johnson's autobiographical account. When they appear, they're grounded in personal experience - like his analysis of the "box checker" dilemma. The question is simple: what constitutes a member of an underprivileged group for the purposes of affirmative action? The answer is complex, if not insoluble. Under pressure to admit or hire individuals from certain groups, many institutions and businesses are keen to count anyone vaguely entitled to membership. Predictably, this has sparked a debate among civil rights activists over who qualifies to check the box. Individuals of mixed racial heritage, like Johnson, come under special scrutiny. The phenomenon is captured by the book's title, "How Did You Get to Be a Mexican?"A senior professor asked Johnson that very question during an interview for a position on a law faculty. Johnson's book offers a partial answer, but no response will prove satisfactory as long as our society remains obsessed with race. Indeed, we can only put racism behind us when we no longer care about the answer. * Bill Hinchberger is the editor of the BrazilMax website. ... Read more Isbn: 1566396514 |
$25.95 |
|
Where Is Your Body?: And Other Essays on Race Gender and the Law by Mari J. Matsuda Average Customer Review: Hardcover (01 December, 1996) list price: $24.00 -- our price: $24.00 (price subject to change: see help) US | Canada | United Kingdom | Germany | France Editorial Review A Japanese American law professor who asks trenchant questions about gender and ethnic identity, Mari Matsuda injects messy reality into complex legal and social doctrines. The title essay in this rousing, incisive collection celebrates the American civil rights protesters who challenged segregation. Among those who laid their bodies on the line, Matsuda hails an earnest group of middle-class black schoolteachers who risked jail by registering to vote. "They are old women now," she writes, "full of peace, I imagine, knowing as they do that they stood tall in a moment of history making." Initially cast as lectures, papers, and speeches, her words have poetic lilt and immediacy.She relishes unpopular, sometimes contradictory positions, wading into the fray on political correctness (she applauds it) and racist speech (she's willing to ban it). Now, says Matsuda, "it is time to hear our own voices, to silence the ones that say 'stop acting your color.' This is the privilege we earned from generations before who made wise choices. They survived so we could flourish, so we could speak up, act up, do right, with our colors flying." ... Read more Reviews (3)
not just for scholars. the words are easily accessible to anyonewho has ever had a harsh wordthrown at them or witnessed any kind ofabusive behavior.
Isbn: 0807067806 |
$24.00 |
|
Rebels in Law : Voices in History of Black Women Lawyers by J. Clay Smith Average Customer Review: Paperback (08 February, 2000) list price: $22.95 -- our price: $22.95 (price subject to change: see help) US | Canada | United Kingdom | Germany | France Reviews (1)
Isbn: 0472086464 |
$22.95 |
|
Called from Within: Early Women Lawyers of Hawaii (Biography Monograph) by Mari J. Matsuda Paperback (01 September, 1992) list price: $24.95 -- our price: $24.95 (price subject to change: see help) US | Canada | United Kingdom | Germany | France Isbn: 0824814487 |
$24.95 |
|
Confronting Authority: Reflections of an Ardent Protester by Derrick Bell Average Customer Review: Paperback (01 January, 1996) list price: $12.00 US | Canada | United Kingdom | Germany | France Reviews (1)
Isbn: 080700927X |
|
|
Rebellious Lawyering: One Chicano's Vision of Progressive Law Practice (New Perspectives on Law, Culture, and Society) by Gerald P. Lopez Paperback (01 July, 1992) list price: $22.95 US | Canada | United Kingdom | Germany | France Isbn: 081338561X |
|
|
Reflections of an Affirmative Action Baby by Stephen L. Carter Average Customer Review: Hardcover (01 September, 1991) list price: $23.00 US | Canada | United Kingdom | Germany | France Reviews (7)
Stephen Carter is just the man to do it. He has written many books on the many aspects of law and, as he conveys in this cultural memoir, has aquired views notoriously hard to pin down (how many 'liberals' do YOU know who wrote books suggesting that church/state seperation has been taken too far?!) Accordingly, he can admits both being helped by affirmative action and being psychologically hurt by some of it's misguided effects. His willingness to think and write about these quandaries, so often neglected by other thinkers, makes this a fascinating read. No dogmatic diatribes or easy answers, just discussion that is passionate yet objective. While affirmative action dominates the first half of the book, it is used as a springboard to the second half, which discusses a deeper problem- that of a noticeable distrust in Black America of dissenting political voices. Thomas Sowell, Shelby Steele, Clarence Thomas and the like are quick to be called 'white' or 'inauthentic' if they voice opinions contrary to mainstream black thought. Whether or not you agree with Carter's observation, his discussion here is lively, thoughtful and always respectful of all angles. So, to close, the reason for the subtracted star is the fact that this book might disappoint two expectations readers may have for it- First, there are no conclusions reached here. While this is a good thing in itself, the reader looking for winning intellectual argument will need to look elsewhere. The second is that the title is a bit misleading as only about 100 pages are actually on affirmative action. Again, the discussion after is just as mind-capturing. Still, because of the title and synopsis, it is a bit misleading.
"Kim," I answered, "what makes you think that black people don't think that everytime we see unqualified white people who've "made it"?Do you really think George W. Bush would have been admitted to Yale if he'd been black?"That gave her some food for thought so I was able to finish my share of the sushi before we moved on to dissect "Memento".I loved it; she hated it. The point is, the argument that affirmative action is somehow unfair to blacks because it lumps the "unqualified" in with the "qualified" is bull.Life lumps the "unqualified" in with the "qualified" all the time.Which is why both a D student cheerleader like George W. Bush and and an A+ student bi-lingual Academy Award winner like Jodie Foster hold degrees from Yale. Why is it that all of the black intellectuals who come out against affirmative action owe their educations and careers to its existence?It's amazing how these men and women want to turn around and lock the doors that openly admitted them so that no more minorities can pass through. Stephen L. Carter's argument is flawed.But I'm sure it helped sell his book, so more power to ya, brotha!Count your cash and forget the cost to minorities in America.
I have many friends from the US, and I have over the years heard they mentioning of "AA-programs". Some of my friends are positive to the AA-programs while others are against them. I must confess that I have absolutely no first-hand experience on this topic at all. I have the "preferred" skin-color, and also I'm living in Norway - which is one of the more advanced countries when it comes to equal opportunities - equal pay etc. Therefore, in the past, I had little to contribute with when the topic was discussed. And lack of knowledge was probably my strongest motive for reading "Reflections of an Affirmative Action Baby". One would think that a serious topic as Affirmative Action really is, would make a dry and rather verbose book. But Dr. Carter has an easy writing style, combined with his personal anecdotes - "Reflections of an Affirmative Action Baby" was an entertaining read! I greatly enjoyed the book from page one. It was too good to put down, so I finished it in a few long sittings. After reading this book, I have a better understanding on how the different AA-program works. And I must admit that I side with the ones of my friends whom are against such programs. This, simply because I truly believe that "color-blind is best". Treat everyone as individuals, and stop the stereotyping, and the building up under the belief that minorities cannot compete in a level playing field. For example, when American universities admit Blacks, Hispanics or others with lower exam scores than the rest, it is a waste of resources. They are more likely to follow the trend with lower test results than the rest, to not pass the exams, or fail to graduate at all (Thomas Sowell "Race and Culture - A world view", 1995). If any minority group be it Blacks, Hispanics or others, score lower than other groups, the recourses should be put in to improving the schools rather than telling them (the minorities) they do not need to meet the same standards as others. I can of course never completely comprehend or understand the terrible injustice and the endless frustrations that the minorities must have suffered, as I believe you have to have "walked in their shoes" to do so. But I am at least much more knowledgeable when discussing the topic. After reading the book I passed it on to my friend, Rosa. She is living in US, but her parents moved from Puerto Rico to US some 30 years ago. She too, finished the book in a sitting or two, and she passed it on to her mother who was visiting from US. Both Rosa and her mother could perfectly well identify with Dr. Carter's book. I can never imagine what it is like to feel the doubt of colleagues to whether my success was achieved because of my race (and thereof by the privileges granted under an AA-program) rather than merit. But according to what Rosa told me, that is something all minorities has to live with. I am sure she knows what she is talking about, being a highly successful woman teaching (and doing her Ph.D.) at one of the best universities in Chicago. Another (black) friend of mine (also very successful) says "..My SAT-score was way above the score required, and I would have been admitted to the West Point Academy even if I was polka-dotted. But I am so used to the accusations of me achieving what I have achieved due to my skin-color rather than to my merits, to the point where that I am not even offended by it anymore..." "Reflections of an Affirmative Action Baby" is a book that taught me many things, and it should be required reading for everyone. It is a book that leaves you thinking - which is not necessarily a bad thing... ... Read more Isbn: 0465068715 |
|
|
Life on the Color Line: The True Story of a White Boy Who Discovered He Was Black by Gregory Howard Williams Average Customer Review: Paperback (01 February, 1996) list price: $13.95 -- our price: $11.16 (price subject to change: see help) US | Canada | United Kingdom | Germany | France Reviews (47)
Isbn: 0452275334 |
$11.16 |
|
Virtual Equality : The Mainstreaming of Gay and Lesbian Liberation by URVASHI VAID Average Customer Review: Paperback (01 May, 1996) list price: $16.00 -- our price: $10.88 (price subject to change: see help) US | Canada | United Kingdom | Germany | France Reviews (7)
On the one hand, Vaid expresses a "sincere" desire to reach out to others in the Gay Lesbian movement.On the other hand, she silences those, like the great Bruce Bower, who disagree with her. ... Read more Isbn: 0385472994 |
$10.88 |
|
One More River to Cross : Black & Gay in America by KEITH BOYKIN Average Customer Review: Paperback (29 December, 1997) list price: $14.00 -- our price: $11.20 (price subject to change: see help) US | Canada | United Kingdom | Germany | France Reviews (7)
After a while, books like this grow tiresome and seem almost cynical in their opportunism.
Isbn: 0385479832 |
$11.20 |
|
Speaking Truth to Power by ANITA HILL Average Customer Review: Paperback (20 October, 1998) list price: $15.00 -- our price: $10.20 (price subject to change: see help) US | Canada | United Kingdom | Germany | France Editorial Review In 1991, Anita Hill, a law professor, dropped a bombshell into the middle of Senate Supreme Court confirmation hearings for Clarence Thomas: Thomas had, Hill alleged, harassed and embarrassed her with repeated requests for dates and discussions about pornography while supervising her at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Hill's allegations introduced a volatile mix of sex, race, and scandal into the proceedings, deeply dividing both the Senate and the entire country. The aftermath of the Thomas hearings saw plenty of books about Anita Hill--some supporting her, others attacking--but Hill remained silent... until now. In Speaking Truth to Power, Anita Hill finally sets the record straight. Though much of the book details her side of the story and her professional relationship with Clarence Thomas, Speaking Truth to Power also provides interesting glimpses into Anita Hill, the person. From her early life as the youngest of 13 children on a farm in Oklahoma to her current position as a law professor, Hill offers details about her personal life and her motivations. Hill writes with forthright conviction; in this case of he said/she said, Speaking Truth to Power tilts the scales a little more heavily in Anita Hill's favor. ... Read more Reviews (18)
I actually looked over my shoulders, when I glanced through this book, before buying it, because I had decided that so many people around me demanded my opinion of this tragedy. When I watched the hearing, while I sat next to others, for whatever reason I waited to say whether or not I believed Dr. Hill.I wanted to process it all, in the privacy of my own space. Watching her, on many levels I related to her.Yet, I had some unanswered questions that reading this book, along with other books that reference this tragedy helped me to make my own decisions about what happened. Dr. Hill put a voice to many of the challenges that I had, as professional African-American woman, who wanted to speak about many issues that too high a number of African-Americans refused to communicate.Before reading this book, I wanted to be free to speak against some socialized rules that I grew up with, that are common in African-American families.But, I wanted to communicate that I am proud of being African-American. And as a result of reading this book, I gained tremendous courage to fully live my life's mission, which is to guide women and girls to earn trust in themselves. To this day, as a journalist, if an editor argues against Anita Hill, I refuse to write for that paper. Thank you, Dr. Hill. ... Read more Isbn: 0385476272 |
$10.20 |
|
Yellow: Race in America Beyond Black and White by Frank H. Wu Average Customer Review: Hardcover (24 December, 2001) list price: $26.00 US | Canada | United Kingdom | Germany | France Editorial Review Yellow by Frank H. Wu is an eclectic, incisive investigation-cum-meditation that, though focusing on Asian Americans, recasts the United States' ongoing debate about racial identity in all forms. Wu suggests that the widespread stereotyping of Asian Americans, while "superficially positive," is inherently damaging. Mixing personal anecdotes, current events, academic studies, and court cases, Wu not only debunks the myth of a "model minority" but also makes discomfiting observations about attitudes toward affirmative action, what he calls "rational" discrimination, mixed marriages, racial profiling, and the "false divisions" of integration versus pluralism and assimilation versus multiculturalism. Though its conclusions are unremarkable, Yellow is thought provoking. The book's strength--besides its clarity and thoughtfulness--is a lack of tendentiousness. Wu prefers to suggest, not posit; muse, not shout; and ask questions, not necessarily answer them. --H. O'Billovitch ... Read more Reviews (9)
1. Wu argues that Asian-Americans ought to support affirmative action for underrepresented minority groups even if they themselves are not included, saying that this will put the needs of the nation at large ahead of self-centered gain. (Contrast this with the writings of K. Anthony Appiah, Dinesh D'Souza and Shelby Steele, for example, for 4 incredibly disparate views of affirmative action by 4 people of color). Overall, this book was a thought-provoking, sometimes troubling, always interesting read.
Isbn: 0465006396 |
|
|
Notes of a White Black Woman: Race Color Community by Judy Scales-Trent Average Customer Review: Hardcover (01 March, 1995) list price: $36.00 -- our price: $36.00 (price subject to change: see help) US | Canada | United Kingdom | Germany | France Reviews (2)
Isbn: 027101430X |
$36.00 |
|
Becoming Gentlemen : Women, Law School, and Institutional Change by Lani Guinier Average Customer Review: Paperback (10 December, 1997) list price: $22.00 -- our price: $22.00 (price subject to change: see help) US | Canada | United Kingdom | Germany | France Reviews (2)
Isbn: 0807044059 |
$22.00 |
|
Lift Every Voice : Turning a Civil Rights Setback Into a New Vision of Social Justice by Lani Guinier Average Customer Review: Hardcover (07 April, 1998) list price: $25.00 US | Canada | United Kingdom | Germany | France Editorial Review When Bill Clinton nominated University of Pennsylvania Law School Professor Lani Guinier to the position of Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights in 1993, she was immediately beset upon by right-wing critics of the president. Taking her writings on cumulative and proportional voting out of context, they branded her a "quota queen." Guinier, on instructions from administration officials, made almost no effort to defend herself against this public smearing of her work and reputation. Then, to her surprise, Clinton himself withdrew her nomination, stating in a press conference that her views were "undemocratic." The Tyranny of the Majority reprinted the articles that were the source of this controversy. Now, in Lift Every Voice, Professor Guinier explains the principles underlying those writings in layman's terms and offers her personal perspective on what happened in the spring and summer of 1993, taking us behind the scenes to meetings with Clinton, Attorney General Janet Reno, and other Washington officials. But perhaps more importantly, she writes about how, after she was cut loose by an intimidated White House, she regained her confidence in the civil rights movement. Recalling the activism of ordinary people like her father and the clients she represented as a lawyer for the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, Guinier reminds us that a better society cannot be built by governmental edict alone, but requires commitment on the part of the citizenry. A recent book on mathematics, K.C. Cole's The Universe and the Teacup, vindicated Guinier's theories on proportional representation at the statistical level. The debate sparked by Lift Every Voice may, in the long run, end up vindicating her at the political level as well. ... Read more Reviews (7)
Robert Bork's nomination split the Congress and the punditry on strictly party lines and it just sohappened that the Democrats controlled the Senate at that point in time, so he went down to defeat. However, he did get to have nomination hearings where he was questioned about his views howeverineptly bythe members of the Senate Judiciary committee.[Personally, I learned more of value aboutconstitutional law by watching the hearings than I did in my law school class.]Despite the fact that hisnomination was clearly doomed, President Reagan stood by him and insisted on putting the matter to avote, allowing Bork to lose honorably and granting him a sense of closure, albeit mixed with disgust, atthe end of the ugly process.Bork later wrote his book in order to explain and amplify his views on theconstitution and the legal system and, to a lesser degree, to give his perspective on the nominationfight.The result is a vital and readable contribution to our understanding of the degree to which ourjurisprudence has become politicized and of the dangers it entails, as well as a resigned, but bemused,look at the Senate by someone who ran afoul of the institution. Lani Guinier's nomination, on the other hand, split the nation along racial lines, with even traditionalwhite allies abandoning black civil rights organizations to oppose her.Ultimately, even Bill Clinton,her longtime friend, repudiated his own nominee and withdrew her name before she got to the hearingsstage.This, understandably, left Guinier frustrated and humiliated, feeling that she had been denied theopportunity to defend her views and her own good name.In the most affecting passages in the book,she describes how she was about to appear on Nightline when Ted Koppel told her that the next day'sNew York Times and Washington Post announced that the White House had decided to pull her name,a fact of which she was unaware at the time.She also describes having old pal Hillary walk right pasther at the White House with a wave and a "Hey kiddo", obviously unwilling to stop and discuss thefiasco and she details her meeting with a dewey eyed President Clinton, who moments after telling herthat the meeting was one of the most difficult of his life went before the White House press corps anddenounced her as "antidemocratic".Guinier has written another book, Tyranny of the Majority, whichI honestly haven't read, but in this book she whines on ad nauseum about how the failure of hernomination was a catastrophe for the cause of civil rights in America.In the strangest maneuver of thebook, she introduces herself early on as someone who was forced to write controversial articles in orderto win tenure, then laments how those views were twisted by the press and hostile politicians, thenreturns at the end of the book to a defense of them as her true beliefs.The result is an enormouslyself-indulgent vanity piece, with insufficient consideration of, and a marked lack of honesty about, thecontroversial theories that ultimately sank her nomination.The book spreads more noise than light onthe issues. The most serious flaw of the book, narrowly outweighing her egomaniacal catalogue of what appears tobe every compliment that she was ever paid in her life, is the disingenuous treatment of theimplications of her view of democracy.The essential fact is that Ms Guinier does not believe that theUnited States Constitution, with it's system of representative democracy, adequately defends the rightsof minorities.Therefore, she proposes adoption of schemes like cumulative voting, geared towardsallowing the losing minority to win actual representation regardless of their election loss.For instance,if a school board district voted 60% Republican and 40% Democrat, they would send three Republicansand two Democrats to the board. Now you could discuss the merits and drawbacks of these types ofRube Goldberg mechanisms until you were blue in the face, but the primary point here is that theyrepresent a radical departure from our current constitutional regime and are a fundamental attack onrepresentative democracy.There is no reason that we should not consider and debate these types ofmeasures, but intellectual honesty requires that their advocates describe them accurately.Guinier'srefusal to do so casts a shadow of deception over the book. In the final analysis, where Judge Bork's book stands out in particular for the intellectual rigor of hisarguments and analysis, Guinier's is merely interesting as a portrait of the shallowness and duplicity ofher friends the Clintons. GRADE: D+
Isbn: 0684811456 |
|
|
Dreams from My Father: : A Story of Race and Inheritance by BARACK OBAMA Average Customer Review: Hardcover (18 July, 1995) list price: $23.00 US | Canada | United Kingdom | Germany | France Reviews (37)
Isbn: 081292343X |
|
|
Fire in My Soul by Joan Lester, Coretta Scott King Average Customer Review: Hardcover (24 December, 2002) list price: $25.00 -- our price: $25.00 (price subject to change: see help) US | Canada | United Kingdom | Germany | France Reviews (12)
Congresswoman Holmes Norton's great grandfather, Richard John Holmes, escaped from Virginia into Washington D.C. to become a free man and elude his former owner. He eventually became one of the few black firemen in the nation's capital and persevered to become a sergeant in the department. He felt a black man was worthy of equal opportunity and it is no surprise she inherited some of her great grandfather'sfire for justice. With a legacy such as this, having descended from a strong, middle-class background, it is little wonder that she pursued a career in law that would one day put her in the limelight. Already involved in civil rights activities, the Congresswoman, while a Yale Law School student, went to Mississippiin June 1963 to join the voter registration drive as a SNCC member. Twenty-four hours later Medgar Evers was dead, victim of an assassination and Holmes Norton had to make quick decisions concerning other members who were being falsely arrested.After law school, she obtained a clerkship with Judge A. LeonHigginbotham, Jr., the first black district court judge, in Philadelphia. She then met her future husband, Edward Norton, also an attorney, a man who was secure enough to not be threatened by her status or activities. Holmes Norton's status did indeed rise as she ventured further into her profession as an attorney, became more involved with civil and human rights, and eventually going into politics. Her life was not always smooth. Her daughter, Katherine, was born with Down's Syndrome; however, she resisted health specialists advice to institutionalize her when she got older. She was very devoted to her. This reviewer had the opportunity of seeing the Congresswomen twice this year. She is as formidable a presence in person as she is in the media. Her stature commands respect and her sense of belief in pursuing and preserving the rights of human life comes across instantaneously. She is a cheerleader for the people of Washington D.C., who she represents with candor and is respected by them as she respects them. This was a well-written biography of a powerful woman. Dera Williams Isbn: 0743407873 |
$25.00 |
| 1-18 of 18 1 |
| Books - Law - Perspectives on Law - Gender & the Law - People of Color in Law Schools (images) |
| Images - 1-18 of 18 1 |
|
| Images - 1-18 of 18 1 |